
There’s an ancient Hebrew proverb that goes something like, “The Rivalry of scholars advances wisdom.” And such was the case of the rivalry between Eric Schiller and Emory Tate. So it was a very special occasion at the Fremont Summer Chess Camp when when Eric Schiller did a two-hour lesson on his three games against Emory Tate while Tate was in the room to interject his opinions. To this day, I still receive “thank you’s” from the young chess players in the room who greatly benefited from the wisdom of these two masters.

Below is part 2 of the trilogy of chess battles between Eric Schiller (March 20, 1955 – November 3, 2018) and Emory Tate (December 27, 1958 – October 17, 2015) with notes by Schiller.
[Event "Western States Open"] [Site "Reno, Nevada (USA)"] [Date "2004.10.16"] [Result "1-0"] [White "Emory Tate"] [Black "Eric Schiller"] 1.e4 {Notes by Eric Schiller.} 1... e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nge7 4.O-O a6 5.Ba4 b5 6.Bb3 Ng6 7.c3 Be7 8.d4 O-O 9.a4 {A new move in this rarely explored opening. It caught me off-guard and I did not react properly.} Bb7 {?! 9...b4 was surely the correct plan. 9...Rb8 looks dubious because of 10.axb5 axb5 11.d5 +- }

10.d5 Nb8 { This retreat is not justified. I simply was afraid of the plan of maneuvering my knight to c4, because I feared that after a capture by the bishop, and recapture with my d-pawn, that the pawn at c4 would then be a serious weakness. 10...Na5 11.Ba2 c5 12.b4 Nc4 13.Bxc4 bxc4 14.bxc5 Bxc5 15.Na3 +0.27 would not be so bad for Black. }

11.Qe2 bxa4 { I was thinking along the lines of my game with Nicholas Yap. that's what happens when you win a nice game, it carries over and the next time you use the opening you tend to play the same way, whether or not it is appropriate.}

12.Rxa4 d6 13.Be3 {+/= No doubt about it, White has a small advantage here. Nevertheless, Black can whip up some serious counter play.}

13... Bc8 {?! This bishop is destined to stagger drunkenly all over the board, without having any serious effect on White's position. 13...Nd7 would've been a much better plan and in that case White's advantage would not have been so significant. }

14.Nbd2 Bd7 15.Ra3 f5 {At this point there really isn't any other source of counterplay.}

16.exf5 Bxf5 17.Bc4 Bg4 18.h3 Bc8 19.Ne4 h6 20.b4 {! +/- White has a dominating position and Black is suffering under the weight of a large number weaknesses.}

20... Qe8 21.Nc5 {! A powerful move! The sacrifice cannot be accepted.}

21... Bd8 { 21...dxc5 ? 22.d6+ Kh8 23.dxe7 Nxe7 24.Bxc5 is a miserable for Black. }

22.Ne6 Rf6 23.Nd2 Bxe6 {!? Of course that this is not the best move, objectively. I made the capture simply because it allowed me to develop a plan to win White's new weakling at e6, and possibly get some counter play going by advancing central pawns. Other moves would have left me with a miserable position with no real chances to establish any sort of counter play.}

24.dxe6 Ne7 { All I have to do is somehow advance my pawn from d6 to d5 and everything will be fine. Unfortunately my opponent doesn't allow me to do that..}

25.Ne4 {!} Rf8 26.Ba2 {By the way, did I underestimate this move. At the very end of the game you will see the point.}

26... Qg6 27.Bc1 Kh8 28.b5 a5 29.f4 {!} d5 { Finally! At this point, however, the move doesn't have much of an impact and allows the knight to take up an even better post at c5.}

30.Nc5 c6 31.Qxe5 Bb6 32.Be3 Nf5 {? Right square, wrong piece. I could have kept the game close by moving my rook to the square. 32...Rf5 ! 33.Qd4 Bxc5 34.Qxc5 Qxe6 35.bxc6 Nbxc6 +/= }

33.Bf2 {? A serious error which allows me to get back into the game, but both of us mis-analyzed the position and missed the finesse at the end. 33.Bd4 ! Nxd4 34.cxd4 cxb5 35.Bxd5 Bxc5 36.dxc5 Ra7 37.f5 was the correct plan. White's passed pawns and dominating bishop provide a winning advantage. }

33... Re8 {? 33...Nh4 ! was the saving plan. I spotted the move, of course, but simply didn't date indeed enough into the position. Both players saw the same continuation [34.Bxd5 ! cxd5 35.Qxd5 Ra7 ! 36.Bxh4 (but here we both failed to spot Rf5 !) 37.Qe4 Bxc5+ 38.Bf2 Qf6 [38...Bxa3 39.Bxa7 ] 39.Bxc5 Rxc5 40.Rxa5 Rxa5 41.e7 Rc8 42.e8=Q+ Rxe8 43.Qxe8+ Kh7 44.Qxb8 Qxc3 with a difficult but not hopeless position for Black. }

34.Bb1 {! +- The bishop slips onto the long diagonal and finishes off the game.}

34... Bxc5 35.Bxc5 Nd7 {I allow Emory Tate to finish the game with a flashy tactic. Why not? He played very well.}

36.exd7 Rxe5 37.fxe5 {I resigned. My opponent at long last got his revenge for my upset victory in the 1997 United States Masters.} 1-0

Eric Schiller VS Emory Tate Game 1